Is Ignorance of the Law a Defense Strategy?

A Team Backed By 100 Years of Experience
|

Ignorance of the Law Is Not a Viable Defense

The legal principle that "ignorance of the law is no excuse" (often expressed in Latin as ignorantia juris non excusat is a fundamental concept in most legal systems. This principle states that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because they were unaware of its content or existence. While this may seem harsh at first glance, it is a necessary foundation for maintaining order and ensuring the effectiveness of criminal proceedings.

Ignorance is not a valid defense for the following reasons:

  • Practical necessity: If ignorance were a valid excuse, it would incentivize willful ignorance and make laws unenforceable.
  • Presumption of knowledge: The law assumes that all citizens have knowledge of the laws governing their society. This presumption is necessary for the functioning of a legal system.
  • Burden on the legal system: Allowing ignorance as a defense would make it impossible for courts to determine each defendant's subjective knowledge.
  • Promotion of civic responsibility: The principle encourages citizens to be informed about the laws that govern them, promoting civic engagement and responsibility.

A Defendant’s Knowledge of a Crime Can Impact Their Defense

While ignorance of the law itself is generally not a valid defense, a defendant's knowledge (or lack thereof) can still play a crucial role in certain aspects of criminal defense. Mistake of fact. Some situations where knowledge becomes relevant include:

  • Mistake of fact. A mistake of fact occurs when a defendant misunderstands the facts of a situation, leading them to commit an act they believed was lawful. Unlike ignorance of the law, a genuine mistake of fact can be a valid defense in many cases. For example, if someone takes another person's coat from a restaurant, genuinely believing it to be their own, they may have a valid defense against theft charges.
  • Intent. Many crimes require specific intent, meaning the defendant must have intended to commit the crime. If a defendant can show they lacked the required intent due to a misunderstanding of the circumstances (not the law), it can be a valid defense. For instance, in a fraud case, if a defendant can prove they genuinely believed the information they provided was true, they may have a defense against charges requiring intent to deceive or misrepresent facts.
  • Changes in the law. In rare cases, a defense based on ignorance might be considered if a law has very recently changed and there hasn't been reasonable time or opportunity for the public to become aware of the change. However, this is an extremely limited exception and is rarely successful.
  • Differences in state and local laws. In some jurisdictions, ignorance of local laws by a non-resident might be considered in certain circumstances as it relates to traffic offenses. This is because it's recognized that individuals traveling between different jurisdictions may not be aware of all local ordinances. However, this is generally limited to minor offenses and is not a blanket exemption.
  • Due process violations. If a law or regulation is not properly published or is so vague that a reasonable person cannot understand what conduct is prohibited, it may violate due process. In such cases, a defense based on lack of notice or understanding might be valid. This is not strictly an "ignorance" defense but rather a challenge to the law's validity or applicability.

Discuss Your Defense Options with Our Attorneys

While the principle that ignorance of the law is not a defense remains a cornerstone of legal systems, it's clear that a defendant's knowledge and understanding can still play significant roles in criminal proceedings. The key distinction lies between ignorance of the law itself (generally not a defense) and ignorance or mistake regarding the facts of a situation (which can be a valid defense in certain circumstances).

Should you be charged with a crime, the attorneys at Corrigan Welbourn Stokke, APLC can discuss viable defenses against the allegations and guide you through the defense process. We have over 100 years of combined experience and are prepared to use that experience for your benefit.

Call (949) 251-0330 to schedule a case consultation today.

Categories: 

Our Settlements & Verdicts

Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.

  • Not Guilty Not Guilty Verdict on multiple Sexual Assault charges
  • Mistrial Mistrial Declared in Attempted Murder Case
  • Dismissed Hung Jury in Re-trial of Penalty Phase of Death Penalty Trial
  • Not Guilty Not Guilty Verdict in $1 Billion Investment Fraud Trial
  • Charges Dismissed Charges Dismissed in Felony Embezzlement of Airplane Case
  • “As far as I'm concerned Ed Welbourne is the Jason Bourne of the courthouse!”
    “As far as I'm concerned Ed Welbourne is the Jason Bourne of the courthouse!”
    Anthony J. G.
  • “I have never met an attorney like Ed before; he is truly one of a kind.”
    “He made me feel like I was important and that I mattered. I have had attorneys in the past and not always good experiences. However, Ed restored my faith in the legal system.”
    Former Client
  • “I am strongly recommend Mr. Welbourn to need an excellent attorney to defense your criminal case. ”
    “Mr. Welbourn fought hard to win the case with excellent result, a misdemeanor with a sentencing of 60 days to do Pay To Stay program.”
    Former Client
  • “(My son) is a better person due to Ed’s efforts and accomplishments on his behalf.”
    “Ed Welbourn is a lifesaver. He has kept my son from making a permanent turn in the wrong direction, by finding him second chances. ”
    Former Client
  • “ I would not hesitate to recommend him to anyone seeking the best in the business.”
    “Ed made a very confusing and scary experience much less so with his caring and professional expertise.”
    Former Client
  • “Mr. Welbourn was very honest with me and at the same time showed by his interest and actions that he really cared about me as an individual. ”
    “It has been my experience that he shows a genuine interest in people and really takes time to listen, which I found refreshing, as attorneys are very busy.”
    Former Client
  • “If I ever need an attorney in the future, he will definitely be my go-to guy.”
    “He has been candid in his assessment of my legal predicaments, appeared in court by my side, and has skillfully guided me through the confusing maze of the Orange County legal system.”
    Former Client
  • “Throughout all the matters I have worked with Ed on, I was impressed and pleasantly surprised at the level of dedication, commitment and energy he put into all three cases. ”
    “ His compassion during a very stressful for time for me and my family was extraordinary. He listened attentively, was extremely thorough, patient and immediately engaged with the case.”
    Former Client