Could Revenge Porn Laws Be Considered Unconstitutional?

A Team Backed By 100 Years of Experience
revenge

Under California Penal Code Section 647(j)(4)PC, it is illegal for a person to distribute images that depict another individual involved in a sexual act, knowing that such dissemination will cause emotional distress to the alleged victim. A person convicted of this offense could be sentenced to up to 6 months in jail and face up to $1,000 in fines. Posting or sending explicit images of others, which is often referred to as revenge porn or sextortion, is prohibited in 45 states, but recently such restrictions have come under fire for being unconstitutional.

Freedom of Expression

The Constitution guarantees individuals the freedom to express themselves, even if their speech includes offensive material. However, certain types of utterances are limited, such as threats and private information. When the government restricts citizens’ rights, it must do so to serve its interests and it can’t be such that it severely limits lawful guarantees.

In today’s digital age, new forms of expression are ever-emerging, creating unique challenges in the legal system as laws were created long before phones and social media were around. Trying to keep statutes current with society’s technological changes and advancements requires a delicate balance of protecting a citizen’s rights while also ensuring the safety of others.

The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to decide on the constitutionality of revenge porn laws. Until it does, each state must determine whether the local statutes infringe on a person’s rights.

California’s revenge porn laws have so far stood the test of public scrutiny, which is mainly because the statute explicitly states that a person must upload an explicit image knowing “that distribution…will cause serious emotional distress, and the person depicted suffers distress.” Many other states do not have such clauses, and court decisions involving these types of offenses have been appealed, arguing that the law is unconstitutional.

Schedule a Free Case Evaluation with Corrigan Welbourn Stokke, APLC Today

Although the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, California laws may restrict that right. Our attorneys have over 100 years of combined experience and will work together to thoroughly review your case and ensure your rights are protected. We know how to fight charges for white-collar crimes such as sending explicit images through electronic communication, and we will work toward getting your charges reduced or dismissed.

For attentive and aggressive legal representation, call us at (949) 251-0330 or contact us online.

Categories: 

Our Settlements & Verdicts

Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.

  • Not Guilty Not Guilty Verdict on multiple Sexual Assault charges
  • Mistrial Mistrial Declared in Attempted Murder Case
  • Dismissed Hung Jury in Re-trial of Penalty Phase of Death Penalty Trial
  • Not Guilty Not Guilty Verdict in $1 Billion Investment Fraud Trial
  • Charges Dismissed Charges Dismissed in Felony Embezzlement of Airplane Case
  • “As far as I'm concerned Ed Welbourne is the Jason Bourne of the courthouse!”
    “As far as I'm concerned Ed Welbourne is the Jason Bourne of the courthouse!”
    Anthony J. G.
  • “I have never met an attorney like Ed before; he is truly one of a kind.”
    “He made me feel like I was important and that I mattered. I have had attorneys in the past and not always good experiences. However, Ed restored my faith in the legal system.”
    Former Client
  • “I am strongly recommend Mr. Welbourn to need an excellent attorney to defense your criminal case. ”
    “Mr. Welbourn fought hard to win the case with excellent result, a misdemeanor with a sentencing of 60 days to do Pay To Stay program.”
    Former Client
  • “(My son) is a better person due to Ed’s efforts and accomplishments on his behalf.”
    “Ed Welbourn is a lifesaver. He has kept my son from making a permanent turn in the wrong direction, by finding him second chances. ”
    Former Client
  • “ I would not hesitate to recommend him to anyone seeking the best in the business.”
    “Ed made a very confusing and scary experience much less so with his caring and professional expertise.”
    Former Client
  • “Mr. Welbourn was very honest with me and at the same time showed by his interest and actions that he really cared about me as an individual. ”
    “It has been my experience that he shows a genuine interest in people and really takes time to listen, which I found refreshing, as attorneys are very busy.”
    Former Client
  • “If I ever need an attorney in the future, he will definitely be my go-to guy.”
    “He has been candid in his assessment of my legal predicaments, appeared in court by my side, and has skillfully guided me through the confusing maze of the Orange County legal system.”
    Former Client
  • “Throughout all the matters I have worked with Ed on, I was impressed and pleasantly surprised at the level of dedication, commitment and energy he put into all three cases. ”
    “ His compassion during a very stressful for time for me and my family was extraordinary. He listened attentively, was extremely thorough, patient and immediately engaged with the case.”
    Former Client